POSSIBILITY OF SEVERAL JOURNEYS TO THE SPACE

By looking into the greatness of the space and the world of existence, we cannot deny journey to the galaxies which has some years of distance of light with us.

In order to explain this statement, we need to expound some introduction before diving into the real issue:

It is possible as an intellectual point of view to say that up till this moment any humanbeing we saw at present is of his shape, and then it is impossible for a person to witness another thing different from what he has seen before?

Undoubtedly that we can say so, because to the time of witness our experience is restricted to some sections of the world and it is limited to period of time and no any way we can issue such law.

Jabir bn Hayyan said: "It is likely that there is an existent in the world which there law are different from the things we saw and those that we are aware of, because the construction of existence of any one of us is such a way that we don't have the capability of knowing the entire creatures.

Jabir after bringing the above example has guided us to the following general basis:

"No one can claim that unpopular phenomenon is like popular phenomenon or what previously existed or what shall come into existence in future is like the existing things now, because the existing humanbeings are incapable and inconsequential and they are limited in terms of time and feelings. Again it is not possible to say that for the fact that no one sees the beginning of the world, then the world is pre-existent and don't have starting point. In my own opinion Jabir in this statement has ascertained the limit of method of experiment in an appropriate form, because he said: any amount of issuing law upon the popular phenomenon compare to unpopular phenomenon is base on probability and that didn't amount to admission. But we must not have farther view that reciprocally denies the existence of unpopular phenomenon till the time it is not examined nor witnessed by us and then this knowledge is inadmissible, because the corollary of this action is restricting humanbeing to the limit of perceptions meanwhile the outcome of it is denying a lot of things which exist in reality.

For example in this world, there are people who has not seen crocodile, if you wanted to explain to them that in this world there is an animal when chewing food it wag its upper jaw, is he able to denies it just because he has not seen such animal? No it is not proper for any one to deny anything simply because he has not envisaged it rather he must not exercise his view hence he don't have proof of the existence or non-existence of such animal.

Base on this, passing law of non-existence of anything with the proof that he has not witnessed it or its information has not come to him, further more denying something which someone got its information through others, in a situation which we did not directly witness it, is not an indication of not having information of method of rationalization which we have previously explained.[1]

Base on this, even though traveling to the moon and mars can not be called possession of the space because of the broadness of the space and the vastness of the heavens, then how can we deem such tread as possession of the space?

By looking into the reason we have quoted from Jabir bn Hayyan, we can't say that just as the present humanbeing can't achieve such thing, then none of the other creatures can achieve that, with the prove that we don't have that information.

It is obvious that such reason as it was said by Jabir bn Hayyan is void.

---